More government documents referring to a “Flat Earth” …

More government documents referring to a “Flat Earth” …

A previous post about NASA stating in print the statement “a stationary atmosphere over a flat, non-rotating earth”, into an official NASA document called “NASA Reference Publication 1207 – August 1988″, served as proof of NASA's knowledge that the Earth is Flat and Non Rotating, hence as proof that NASA's claims of a rotating Globe Earth are false. Said NASA government declassified document stated on page 30 the following:

3. CONCLUDING REMARKS
‘This report derives and defines a set of linearized system matrices for a rigid aircraft of constant mass, flying in a stationary atmosphere over a flat, nonrotating earth.’

Here is another government document, this time from the FAA, entitled …

"The Engineering Analysis and Design
of the Aircraft Dynamics Model For the
FAA Target Generation Facility"

Mark Peters
Michael A. Konyak
Prepared for:
Scott Doucett
ANG-E161
Simulation Branch, Laboratory Services Division
Federal Aviation Administration
William J. Hughes Technical Center
Atlantic City, NJ 08405
Under:
Air Traffic Engineering Co., LLC
1027 Route 9 South
Palermo, NJ 08223
FAA Prime Contract No. DTFAWA-10A-00020
October 2012




That makes several Flat Earth references as follows:

On page xxiv it states:
"X location of the aircraft in flat Earth coordinates "

On page xxvi it states:
"Z-axis of the flat Earth inertial reference frame"

On page xxv it states:
"Y-axis in the flat Earth inertial reference frame"
"Y location of the aircraft in flat Earth coordinates "
"X-axis in the flat Earth inertial frame"

On page 32, It states
"The observant reader will notice that the aircraft equations of motion were calculated assuming a flat Earth and that we here assume the development frame was the NorthEast-Down frame.

This implies necessarily that earth rotation and the variation of the
gravity vector with position over the earth were ignored in developing the aircraft equations of motion. This simplification limits our mathematical model to the flight of aircraft only. The model will not properly handle the flight of sub-orbital craft and spacecraft such as intercontinental ballistic missiles, satellites, or the space shuttle. The
model is adequate for all vehicles traveling under Mach 3. "

HERE YOU NOTICE THE STATEMENT THAT THE CONCEPTS OF EARTH ROTATION AND GRAVITY VECTOR VARIATIONS WITH POSITION OVER THE EARTH ARE IGNORED IN DEVELOPING THE AIRCRAFT EQUATIONS FOR MOTIONS.

SEE THE STATEMENT " that earth rotation and the variation of the
gravity vector with position over the earth were ignored in developing the aircraft equations of motion'

So in other words, for all intents and purposes, unless you are traveling at above Mach 3, or intend to travel into low Earth orbit or higher, then you should just consider the earth to be flat.

But if the Earth was truly curved then this would not work.

For example if you were flying from Sydney, on the east coast of Australia to Perth in Western Australia you would have to travel a distance of 2034 miles.

The alleged Earth curvature over that distance should be 522.37 miles. That means that unless the pilot constantly dipped the nose of the plane down towards the ground as he flew, by the time he reached Perth he would be flying at an altitude of 522.37 miles or 2,758,113 feet higher than he should be!

This fact alone proves the EARTH IS FLAT!

You can download the document directly from the FAA here.:

http://www.faa.gov/about/office_org/headquarters_offices/ang/offices/tc/about/campus/faa_host/labs/tgf/media/AircraftDynamicsModel.pdf


Please note that there are no references to a Global Rotating Earth anywhere in this document. My search only yielded the following 2 results which ave nothing to do with the global shape of the earth :

Global Positioning System

and its reference source

Parkinson, B.W., Spilker, J.J. (1996). Global Positioning System: Theory and Applications. Washington, DC: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.

SIMILARLY REPETITIVE STATEMENTS FOR "AIRCRAFT ROTATION SPEED" WERE YIELDED FROM MY SEARCH USING THE TERMS "ROTATE - ROTATION" AND NONE HAD ANYTHING TO DO WITH THE EARTH'S ROTATION.

i just found out a link of a book that mentions this article in detail and, thankfully so, it brings up the same issues and points that I brought up here based on my humble observations and limited knowledge about Aviation related matters. The content of this book also serves to discredit the claims made by the government / NASA trolling shill that I had the displeasure of commenting with today 5-13-16. See the entire comment exchange between us along with his claims in his video and comments to me, at this link

https://plus.google.com/+GovernmentGangStalkingandElectronicHarassment/posts/AWSWAfsy69Y

This is the link
https://books.google.com/books?id=4_VqCwAAQBAJ&pg=PA53&lpg=PA53&dq=FAA+DOCUMENTS+WITH+FLAT+EARTH&source=bl&ots=N-iSOaZX2A&sig=plhSq0-ddwGCLMF1zb7zNDKWAQs&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjZtMulxNfMAhUFrB4KHfP6A0YQ6AEILjAD#v=onepage&q=FAA%20DOCUMENTS%20WITH%20FLAT%20EARTH&f=false


The Greatest Lie on Earth: Proof That Our World Is Not a Moving Globe

By Edward Hendrie
READ PAGES 50-59

FOR YOUR IMMEDIATE CONVENIENCE I POSTED PAGES 50-59, AS IMAGES, HERE
https://plus.google.com/+GovernmentGangStalkingandElectronicHarassment/posts/LanQCknkr65

ZOOM IN TO READ UP AND CLOSE

IT APPEARS THAT i HAD POSTED THIS BOOK BEFORE BUT I HAD NOT READ THE ENTIRE BOOK. NOW THAT I FOUND THE ABOVE NOTED ARTICLE AND I TRACED ITS REFERENCE INTO THIS BOOK , I REALIZED HOW IMPORTANT THIS BOOK IS .

THIS TIME I WILL READ THE ENTIRE BOOK
I RECOMMEND THAT YOU DO THE SAME
.
http://www.faa.gov/about/office_org/headquarters_offices/ang/offices/tc/about/campus/faa_host/labs/tgf/media/AircraftDynamicsModel.pdf