THE EARTH IS AT REST - THERE IS NO DOUBT ABOUT THAT

THE EARTH IS AT REST - THERE IS NO DOUBT ABOUT THAT

- See Where Felix Baumgartner Landed !

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KO-aj0WEbqA


COMMENTS PINNED UNDER VIDEO

1. The world doesn't rotate. We live on a stationary earth. The atmosphere doesn't spin along with the world. Otherwise on a calm day with no wind the air a few thousand feet high would be ripping by at crazy speed just to keep up with the ground. Had aircraft been invented before the heliocentric model it would have never caught on. Outer space cant be a vacuum because high pressure always moves toward low pressure. There has to be some sort of shield or dome. Some type of barrier preventing us from losing our atmosphere. The myth of gravity was only invented to explain why we don't fly off of the big spinning ball. Every time someone points out that what we observe doesn't match what we are told they give gravity new magical powers to explain it. Never mind nobody has ever proven gravity to be a real force. What other "force" has the same effect on everything regardless of its mass or size? Nothing. What other "force" can act at a distance of millions of miles? Nothing. What is gravity? Noone knows! -- Something that weights 100 kg at the North Pole wouldn't weight 100 kg at the equator because of the centrifugal force which would cause that an object (which weight we would try to measure and compare) weights less than 100 kg at the equator. This is one another simple method which was never used in order to verify trueness of this ridiculous theory of the spinning globe

2. If flying had been invented at the time of Copernicus, there is no doubt that he would have soon realized that his contention regarding the rotation of the earth was wrong, on account of the relation existing between the speed of an aircraft and that of the earth’s rotation. If the earth rotates, as it is said, at 1,000 miles an hour, and a plane flies in the same direction at only 500 miles, it is obvious that its place of destination will be farther removed every minute. On the other hand, if flying took place in the direction opposite to that of the rotation, a distance of 1,500 miles would be covered in one hour, instead of 500, since the speed of the rotation is to be added to that of the plane. It could also be pointed out that such a flying speed of 1,000 miles an hour, which is supposed to be that of the earth’s rotation, has recently been achieved, so that an aircraft flying at this rate in the same direction as that of the rotation could not cover any ground at all. It would remain suspended in mid-air over the spot from which it took off, since both speeds are equal.

3. How high must one get before the atmospheric rotation does not exist? For if all rotates it must have to stop somewhere. I figure at mt Everest you have one third less air at top so wouldn't that mean at 100,000 feet, if mt Everest is at 28000 ft, no air or no atmosphere? So why not simple make airplanes outfitted for 110000 ft go up and then come down and let the earth spin underneath to arrive at ur destination. Well, how about numerous footages (available on youtube) taken by cameras (attached to a baskets of a balloons that can go as high as 125 000 feet) in which we can clearly see perfectly still earth underneath??? U know why they don't, because it's all Bullshit?

4. If gravity can drag atmosphere in such a manner that every single molecule of air moves along the earth with correspondent velocity in relation to the supposed velocity of certain latitudinal point on the earth, and if gravity in such (just described) manner can allow inertia to counteract air drug, then you have to accept one other assumption (which no sane person can accept recognising it - at the first glance - as nothing more but stupid speculation, just like everything else in HC theory is) according which every single molecule of air would have to be somehow "glued" to correspondent latitudinal point on the earth.

5.The prosperity of heliocentrism was ceased a by talented objection, that all dropped objects should land behind their starting positions because the turning Earth leaves them behind. Unfortunately, the objection of the talented people was refuted because of a dead law in air atmosphere – the law of inertia. It is the Galileo’s law and the first law of Newton. Their common reply is that: all dropped objects have inertia, and thus, the rotating Earth will not leave them behind. The law of inertia cannot be applied in air atmosphere under any conditions. Galileo demanded that, the law of inertial is valid only in the absence of air but the Helios fellows extended the inertial law in air atmosphere. We would gratefully appreciate Galileo if his law were situated in air, since it will save our Earth from the pollutions of the fossils. Argue or not, it is well-known fact since the ancient civilizations. In the presence of air atmosphere, the law of inertia does not function. If you threw an object aloft several meters, it will come back to your hand; not because of the law of inertia but because the Earth is stationary. You cannot breathe oxygen from air atmosphere and speak about the law of inertia. Dump the law of inertia in space.

6. Heliocentrists believe the world beneath their feet is spinning a mind-numbing 1,038 mph at the equator while perfectly pulling the entire atmosphere along for the ride. Meanwhile at the mid-latitudes of USA and Europe, they believe the world / atmosphere spin around 900-700 mph decreasing gradually all the way down to 0 mph at the North and South poles, where the stagnant atmosphere apparently never moves completely escaping the grips of gravity’s magic velcro. This means at all latitudes, every inch of the way, the atmosphere manages to perfectly coincide with the supposed speed of the Earth compensating from 0 mph at the poles all the way up to 1,038 mph at the equator, and every speed in between. These are all lofty assumptions heliocentrists make without any experimental evidence to back them up.

7. No experiment has ever been performed with such excruciating persistence and meticulous precision, and in every conceivable manner, than that of trying to detect and measure the motion of the Earth. Yet they have all consistently and continually yielded a velocity for the Earth of exactly ZERO mph.

The toil of thousands of exasperated researchers, in the extremely varied experiments of Arago, De Coudre's induction, Fizeau, Fresnell drag, Hoek, Jaseja's lasers, Jenkins, Klinkerfuess, Michelson-Morley interferometry, Lord Rayleigh's polarimetry, Troughton-Noble torque, and the famous 'Airy's Failure' experiment, all conclusively failed to show any rotational or translational movement for the earth, whatsoever."

8. --- Very simple and irrefutable experiment : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Rg5YLPjQok

--- Very simple and irrefutable argument : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QuXxl16w9W8&t=103s

9. If the Government or NASA had said to you that the Earth is stationary, imagine that. And then imagine we are trying to convince people that 'no, no it's not stationary, it's moving forward at 32 times rifle bullet speed and spinning at 1,000 miles per hour.' We would be laughed at! We would have so many people telling us 'you are crazy, the Earth is not moving!' We would be ridiculed for having no scientific backing for this convoluted moving Earth theory. And not only that but then people would say, 'oh then how do you explain a fixed, calm atmosphere and the Sun's observable movement, how do you explain that?' Imagine saying to people, 'no, no, the atmosphere is moving also but is somehow magically velcroed to the moving-Earth. The reason is not simply because the Earth is stationary.' So what we are actually doing is what makes sense. We are saying that the moving-Earth theory is nonsense. The stationary-Earth theory makes sense and we are being ridiculed. You've got to picture it being the other way around to realize just how RIDICULOUS this situation is.

10. This theory from the Government and NASA that the Earth is rotating and orbiting and leaning over and wobbling is absolute nonsense and yet people are clinging to it, tightly, like a teddy bear. They just can't bring themselves to face the possibility that the Earth is stationary though ALL the evidence shows it: we feel no movement, the atmosphere hasn't been blown away, we see the Sun move from East-to-West, everything can be explained by a motionless Earth without bringing in all these assumptions to cover up previous assumptions gone bad."

ALSO SEE

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S04gzZfXvQI


AND

FLAT EARTH PROOF - Bedford Canal, England1870 and California Experiments - FACTS!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z2Ie0sjd-ik

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KO-aj0WEbqA